IMIS | Lifewatch regional portal

You are here

IMIS

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Same species, different population dynamics: Spatio‐temporal differences of Undaria pinnatifida (Ochrophyta, Phaeophyceae) in the intertidal of North Patagonia, Argentina
Arcángel, A.E.; Rodríguez, E.A.; Saad, J.F.; de la Barra, P.; Narvarte, M.A.; Storero, L.P.; Pereyra, P.J. (2023). Same species, different population dynamics: Spatio‐temporal differences of Undaria pinnatifida (Ochrophyta, Phaeophyceae) in the intertidal of North Patagonia, Argentina. J. Phycol. 59(6): 1310-1322. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpy.13395
In: Journal of Phycology. Blackwell Science: New York. ISSN 0022-3646; e-ISSN 1529-8817, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Author keywords
    introduced macroalgae; morphometric variables; Patagonia Argentina; population biology

Authors  Top 
  • Arcángel, A.E.
  • Rodríguez, E.A.
  • Saad, J.F.
  • de la Barra, P., more
  • Narvarte, M.A.
  • Storero, L.P.
  • Pereyra, P.J.

Abstract
    Population dynamics can be influenced by physical and biological factors, particularly in stressful environments. Introduced species usually have great physiological plasticity, resulting in populations with different traits. Undaria pinnatifida, a macroalga originally described from northeast Asia, was introduced in Northern Patagonia, Argentina (San Matías Gulf) around 2010. To describe the spatio-temporal variability in population structure and morphometry of U. pinnatifida, we conducted monthly field samplings for 2 years at the intertidal area of two contrasting sites in the San Matías Gulf. Individuals of U. pinnatifida were classified by developmental stage, and their morpho-gravimetric variables were measured. In both intertidal sites juveniles were found in higher proportion during austral autumn and grew and matured during the autumn-winter months (from May onwards), and individuals senesced during early austral summer (December and January). Conversely, density and biomass were largely different between sites, and individuals showed slight morphological variability between sites. Environmental (e.g., nutrient concentration, available substrate) and biological factors (e.g., facilitation, competition) may explain the observed differences. Since there is not a macroalga with U. pinnatifida morphometrical characteristics in the intertidal environments of San Matías Gulf, studying this recent introduction gives us a better understanding of its potential ecological effects.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors