IMIS | Lifewatch regional portal

You are here

IMIS

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Pan‐Arctic soil moisture control on tundra carbon sequestration and plant productivity
Zona, D.; Lafleur, P.M.; Hufkens, K.; Gioli, B.; Bailey, B.; Burba, G.; Euskirchen, E.S.; Watts, J.D.; Arndt, K.A.; Farina, M.; Kimball, J.S.; Heimann, M.; Göckede, M.; Pallandt, M.; Christensen, T.R.; Mastepanov, M.; López‐Blanco, E.; Dolman, A.J.; Commane, R.; Miller, C.E.; Hashemi, J.; Kutzbach, L.; Holl, D.; Boike, J.; Wille, C.; Sachs, T.; Kalhori, A.; Humphreys, E.R.; Sonnentag, O.; Meyer, G.; Gosselin, G.H.; Marsh, P.; Oechel, W.C. (2023). Pan‐Arctic soil moisture control on tundra carbon sequestration and plant productivity. Glob. Chang. Biol. 29(5): 1267-1281. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16487

Additional data:
In: Global Change Biology. Blackwell Publishers: Oxford. ISSN 1354-1013; e-ISSN 1365-2486, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Author 

Author keywords
    carbon loss; climate change; drying; permafrost; tundra

Author  Top 

Abstract
    Long- term atmospheric CO2 concentration records have suggested a reduction in the positive effect of warming on high- latitude carbon uptake since the 1990s. A vari-ety of mechanisms have been proposed to explain the reduced net carbon sink of northern ecosystems with increased air temperature, including water stress on veg-etation and increased respiration over recent decades. However, the lack of consist-ent long-term carbon flux and in situ soil moisture data has severely limited our ability to identify the mechanisms responsible for the recent reduced carbon sink strength. In this study, we used a record of nearly 100 site-years of eddy covariance data from 11 continuous permafrost tundra sites distributed across the circumpolar Arctic to test the temperature (expressed as growing degree days, GDD) responses of gross primary production (GPP), net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and ecosystem respira-tion (ER) at different periods of the summer (early, peak, and late summer) including dominant tundra vegetation classes (graminoids and mosses, and shrubs). We further tested GPP, NEE, and ER relationships with soil moisture and vapor pressure deficit to identify potential moisture limitations on plant productivity and net carbon exchange. Our results show a decrease in GPP with rising GDD during the peak summer (July) for both vegetation classes, and a significant relationship between the peak summer GPP and soil moisture after statistically controlling for GDD in a partial correlation analysis. These results suggest that tundra ecosystems might not benefit from in-creased temperature as much as suggested by several terrestrial biosphere models, if decreased soil moisture limits the peak summer plant productivity, reducing the abil-ity of these ecosystems to sequester carbon during the summer.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Author